From tabletop exercises to the global rollout of untested deadly vaccines—a consolidated history of staged “pandemics,” courageous whistleblowers, and future bioweapons.

Credit: National Archives Catalog
A Legacy of Self-Inflected Wounds
Author and researcher Eleanor McBean, PhD, ND (1905–1989) wrote a number of books addressing “pandemics” and the fraudulent use and devastating effects of mass vaccination programs.

WWI soldiers being vaccinated at the Army Medical School. Credit: Reeve 167
In Chapter 7 of her controversial book, THE POISONED NEEDLE, Suppressed Facts About Vaccination (1957), Dr. McBean wrote:
30,438 SOLDIERS WERE STRICKEN BY VACCINATION DISEASE
The Report of the Surgeon General of the Army, (1919) vol. I, page 37, gives the number of admissions to hospitals during the year 1918, on account of vaccinia (vaccination disease) as 10,830.
The Report of the Surgeon General of the Army, (1918) gives me the number of admissions to hospitals during the year 1917, on account of vaccinia and vaccinal-typhoid combined as 19,608.
Here we find that in only two years of the war and in only one army there were over 30,000 soldiers hospitalized by vaccination. This does not take into consideration the thousands who were seriously ill but not critical enough to be hospitalized, nor the cases of chronic disease that developed later as a result of the cumulative effects of poisons from vaccines and drugs.
Herbert Spencer, in his “History of Epidemics in Great Britain” voiced the sentiments of the best authorities when he said: “Vaccination, in subduing one disease only increases others.”
Flashback 1976: The Swine Flu Epidemic
Americans over 60 will undoubtedly remember the swine flu scare in the mid-1970s that had people scrambling to get vaccinated.
Triggered by the reported death of a US soldier diagnosed with swine flu, the US government launched a campaign to inoculate every man, woman, and child in the United States. With media and health officials citing fears of a repeat of the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918, an event said to have originated in Spain but later proven to be the result of a multi-nation toxic vaccination crusade causing the deaths of millions of people worldwide—46 million Americans obediently took the swine flu vaccine.
Turns out, swine flu never developed into the global pandemic that health experts predicted. By 1979, more than 4,000 injury claims—including Guillain-Barré syndrome, a paralyzing neurological disease and approximately 300 deaths—had been filed against the US government. The total damages sought reached $3.5 billion, transforming the swine flu vaccination program from a national health initiative into a legal and medical catastrophe.
It’s important to note that the National Swine Flu Immunization Program implemented on March 24, 1976 was halted after two months because the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 had yet to be written and passed into law which, as we now know, provides complete immunity to vaccine manufacturers from tort actions filed in state or federal court by injured victims seeking compensation for injuries.
Back in the day when mainstream media had a modicum of journalistic integrity, CBS’s 60 Minutes host Mike Wallace conducted a no-holds-barred interview with Dr. David Judson Sencer on November 4,1979. Dr. Sencer was the public health official who orchestrated the 1976 immunization program against swine flu. He served as the director of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) between 1966 and 1977.
To say that Dr. Sencer sounded like an incompetent and irresponsible stooge choking on a web of lies would be a gross understatement.
[5:58] Mike Wallace: You began to give flu shots to the American people in October of ’76.
Dr. Sencer: October 1st.
Mike Wallace: By that time how many cases of swine flu around the world had been reported?
Dr. Sencer: There had been ah, several reported but none confirmed. There had been cases in ah, Australia that were reported by the press, ah, by the news media there were cases . . .
Mike Wallace: None confirmed. Did you ever uncover any other outbreaks of swine flu anywhere in the world?
Dr. Sencer: No.
Forty-six million Americans obediently rolled up their sleeves and took the swine flu vaccine on the word of a public health official with no evidence of a confirmed case anywhere in the world. Think about that for a moment.
To expedite the vaccine in a public health facility where a doctor might not be present, the CDC devised an official consent form with the intent of providing the public with all the information about the vaccine. The form stated that the swine flu vaccine had been tested. What it didn’t say, as Wallace reported, was that after those tests were completed, scientists developed another vaccine that was the one given to most of the 46 million who took the shot. That vaccine was called X-53A.
[7:05] Mike Wallace: Was X-53A ever field tested?
Dr. Sencer: Ah, I . . . I can’t say. I would have to . . .
Mike Wallace: It wasn’t!
Dr. Sencer: I don’t know.
Mike Wallace: I would think that you’re in charge of the program . . .
Dr. Sencer: I would have to check, ah, the records. I haven’t looked at this in some time.
[8:00] Mike Wallace: Did anyone ever come to you and say, you know something fellas, there’s the possibility of neurological damage if you get into a mass immunization program?
Dr. Sencer: No.
Mike Wallace: No one ever did?
Dr. Sencer: No.
At that point in the interview, Mike Wallace presented Dr. Sencer with a document dated July 1976 that had been provided to him, specifically listing neurological complications as a possible adverse reaction to the swine flu vaccine, clear evidence that he was aware of the potential dangers of the untested X-53A vaccine. Dr. Sencer was visibly nervous. He attempted to change the subject and Mike Wallace interrupted him.
Mike Wallace: You didn’t feel it was necessary to tell the American people that information?
Dr. Sencer: Ah, I think that over the years we tried to inform the American people as fully as possible.
Astonishingly, Dr. Sencer, the former director of the CDC responsible for the health and well-being of the American public, was appointed and served as New York City Health Commissioner from 1981 to 1986, two years after this 60 Minutes broadcast aired on national television. In my view, this would be like appointing David Berkowitz, NYC’s infamous “.44 Caliber Killer,” as Commissioner of Gun Control and Firearms Regulations.
Cut to 2020: Lockdowns, Face Masks, and Social Distancing
In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a worldwide “pandemic” attributed to a dubious virus of questionable origins. When the news broke, people busy living their lives were suddenly thrust into panic mode. With little reason to distrust the measured and reassuring voice of Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), they were unaware that he and many others were part of the development, planning, and execution of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), a planned “pandemic” that had been years in the making, a plan that required a fresh and more sophisticated approach to igniting panic and fear on a global scale.
Operation Lock Step
Early evidence of this diabolical scheme is a document published by the Rockefeller Foundation in May 2010: “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.”
The twisted individuals who crafted this paper outlined specific planned narratives for introducing a global pandemic and creating mass chaos with the intent of cultivating “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.”
Commonly referred to as “Operation Lock Step,” a section of the plan titled “Scenario Narratives” details chilling circumstances for implementing control and world domination:
During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
Convinced that the stated narratives would come to fruition and that people would adhere to the Rockefeller scheme in lockstep, the plan states:
Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
Event 201
Equally disturbing, was “Event 201, A Global Pandemic Exercise,” a live event that just happened to take place nine years later in New York City on October 18, 2019, a few months before the March 2020 announcement of the COVID-19 “pandemic.”
Hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (JHCHS) in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Event 201 was:
. . . a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic. 15 global business, government, and public health leaders were players in the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political will, financial investment, and attention now and in the future.
The exercise consisted of pre-recorded news broadcasts, live “staff” briefings, and moderated discussions on specific topics. These issues were carefully designed in a compelling narrative that educated the participants and the audience.
It should be noted that prior to Event 201, The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted similar pandemic tabletop exercises,Clade X, that took place on May 15, 2018 in Washington, DC., and Dark Winter, held at Andrews AFB, Washington, DC, June 22–23, 2001.
Dark Winter portrayed a fictional scenario depicting a covert smallpox attack on US citizens. Pesky coincidence theorists were quick to point out that the scheduling of Dark Winter was remarkably close to the 2001 anthrax attacks, also known as Amerithrax, that occurred in the United States over the course of several weeks beginning on September 18, 2001, one week after the attacks on September 11 when letters containing anthrax spores were mailed to several news media offices and to Senators Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy, killing five people and infecting seventeen others.
COVID-19: No Problem—We’re All In!
Convinced by an overwhelming, all-out pre-planned media blitz replete with 24/7 dire news bulletins, relentless guilt shaming, spotlight hungry celebrity influencers, and politicians deep in the pockets of big pharma, most people were elated and proud to roll up their sleeves and take the jab. (Hey, I just got mine. Did you get yours?) They did so without question or an ounce of consideration given to the ingredients, efficacy, and irrevocable life-altering adverse reactions and deaths accompanying unapproved, untested, rush-to-market Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) vaccines.
Financial Incentives for Jacking Up the Numbers
Hospitals and medical facilities were paid handsomely for every patient diagnosed with COVID-19 along with coroners recording COVID-19 on death certificates regardless of a deceased person’s actual cause of death.
Deborah Birx served as the coordinator of the White House Coronavirus Task Force under President Donald Trump from 2020 to 2021. Who can ever forget her 2020 White House duplicitous presentation where she shamelessly described the process for tracking COVID-19 cases:
I think in this country we’ve taken a very liberal approach to mortality, and I think that reporting here has been pretty straightforward over the last five to six weeks. Prior to that, when there wasn’t testing in January and February, that’s a very different situation and unknown.
There are other countries that—if you had a pre-existing condition, and let’s say, the virus caused you to go to the ICU, and then have a heart or kidney problem, some countries are recording that as a heart issue or a kidney issue, and not a COVID-19 death. Right now, we’re still recording it, and we all . . . I mean, the great thing about having forms that come in, and a form that has the ability to mark it as a COVID-19 infection the intent is right now is . . . if someone dies with COVID-19 we are counting that as a COVID-19 death [emphasis added].
Having forms that come in? Not corrupt bought-and-sold doctors and hospitals that were paid thousands of dollars for each patient they diagnosed as having COVID-19, but a form. A form came in and did it.
Birx’s demeanor, thoughts, and speech pattern were galling and revealing. She was speaking to the world with the unadulterated assumption that we were all gullible idiots and that—because she was in a position of authority—people would automatically accept what she was saying regardless of how irrational or illogical it sounded.
Killing for Profit
Dr. David Martin is the Founder and Chairman of M·CAM Inc., the international leader in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance. Actively engaged in global ethical economic development with a focus on transparency, Dr. Martin’s work includes financial engineering and investment, public speaking, writing, and providing financial advisory services to the majority of countries in the world.
In a riveting June 23, 2023 presentation, Dr. Martin addressed the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France where he detailed the history of coronaviruses and their specific development and intent to be used as a bioweapon targeting human beings:
[10:11] But then we had an interesting development in 2002. And this date is most important because in 2002, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill patented, and I quote, an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus. Listen to those words, infectious replication defective. What does that phrase actually mean? For those of you not familiar with language, let me unpack it for you.
Infectious replication defective means a weapon. It means something meant to target an individual but not have collateral damage to other individuals. That’s what infectious replication defective means. And that patent was filed in 2002 on work funded by NIAID’s Anthony Fauci from 1999 to 2002. And that work patented at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill mysteriously preceded SARS 1.0 by a year.
[Dr. Martin gasps.] Dave, are you suggesting that SARS 1.0 wasn’t from a wet market in Wuhan? Are you suggesting it might have come from a laboratory in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill?
No, I’m not suggesting it. I’m telling you, that’s the facts. We engineered SARS. SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold. It’s called influenza-like illness. It’s called gastroenteritis. That’s the naturally occurring coronavirus.
SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to actually attack human beings. And they patented it in 2002.
To no surprise, Dr. Martin’s statement was followed by a generous round of applause.
The Whistleblowers

Credit: Call for Freedom
One of the hallmarks of a healthy democracy is its ability to self-correct when confronted with tyranny, corruption, and blatant injustices. An essential component in this process is the whistleblowers, heroic individuals driven by a personal and moral obligation—men and women with gonads of steel, willing to step forward, point a finger, and lay their reputation, career, and personal well-being on the line regardless of consequences.
The subsequent mask mandates, lockdowns, and social distancing conventions gave rise to a tidal wave of medical whistleblowers—highly credentialed and experienced physicians, nurses, virologists, cardiologists, and research professionals that the corporate media rushed to discredit, demonize, and label anti-vax conspiracy theorists, a convenient one-stop catchphrase adopted by people who have neither the will, desire, or critical thinking skills to do their own research and come to their own conclusions.
The following is a selected shortlist of the many courageous whistleblowers who have stepped up to the plate and made a significant dent in exposing the fraudulent “pandemic” narrative. Their contributions have paved the way for serious and open discussions regarding medical autonomy, informed consent, fake science, deceptive marketing practices, and the consequences of profit-driven healthcare.
Dr. Michael Yeadon / Former Pfizer VP and Chief Science Officer
Dr. Michael Yeadon is a trained biochemist and pharmacologist who obtained his PhD from the University of Surrey (UK) in 1988. He has over twenty-three years in the pharmaceutical industry and served as former Pfizer vice president and chief scientist worldwide for respiratory pharmacology and toxicology. After parting ways with Pfizer in 2011, Dr. Yeadon continued his research and became a resolute critic of global elites, big pharma, and the efficacy of vaccines. In an interview with Children’s Health Defense, he discussed the COVID-19 deception, the economic agenda behind the staged pandemic, and the truth about surveillance, reproductive health, and toxicology.
It is my view that the entire global pandemic is a fraud that was planned for with great deliberation by a group of people ultimately representing what we call global capital. So, the whole thing has been manufactured using unreliable PCR testing and lies about the concept of asymptomatic transmission—the idea that people that are not ill have symptoms that can affect others.
In December 2024, Dr. Yeadon gave a sobering, twenty-two-minute fact-based presentation detailing the real diabolical intention behind the manufactured “pandemic.”
. . . the materials masquerading as vaccines were designed intentionally to harm the people who received them.
Dr. Kary Mullis / Inventor of PCR Technology
and Nobel Prize Recipient
Dr. Kary Mullis was an American biochemist. In recognition of his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, Dr. Mullis was a recipient of the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year. His invention became a central technique in biochemistry and molecular biology, described by the New York Times as “highly original and significant, virtually dividing biology into the two epochs of before PCR and after PCR.”
Dr. Mullis was adamant about the use and misinterpretation of the PCR test as a tool for detecting viruses and uses other than its intended purpose of amplifying small segments of DNA to make them easier to analyze. Unsurprisingly, Dr. Mullis was a staunch critic of Dr. Anthony Fauci. In a 1996 interview, Dr. Mullis said the following:
… guys like Fauci get up there and start talking … he doesn’t know anything, really, about anything. And I’ll say that to his face; nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there, you’ll know it. Those guys have an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way.
Dr. Kary Mullis died at home from heart and respiratory failure in August 2019.
His passing was just weeks before Event 201, the tabletop pandemic simulation exercise hosted by the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and a few months before the real-time March 2020 announcement of the Covid-19 “pandemic” and the subsequent introduction of the PCR test as the diagnostic gold standard for detecting what we are told is a life-threatening COVID-19 virus.
Dr. Mullis was 74. If he were alive today, one can only imagine what his response would be to the COVID-19 narrative and the tens of thousands of PCR tests being administered daily to detect the presence of a virus.
Dr. Scott Jensen / Family Doctor and Former MN State Senator
A family physician for over forty years, Dr. Scott Jenson also served as a member of the Minnesota Senate from 2017 to 2021. In an April 2020 local television interview that gained national attention, Dr. Jenson revealed that the Center for Disease Control (CDC) had inexplicably changed its policy on completing death certificates and that new nationwide guidance had been issued requiring doctors to attribute patient deaths to COVID-19 regardless of their actual cause of death. Dr. Jenson further disclosed that medical institutions were provided monetary incentives to “game” and “massage” data. In 2020, Medicare was giving hospitals $13,000 for each patient diagnosed with COVID-19 and a whopping $39,000 for each patient placed on a ventilator.
As a result of his public comments, Dr. Jenson was ostracized by a number of his colleagues and notified by the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice that he was under investigation for spreading misinformation and providing reckless advice. He has since filed a lawsuit against the board and those who have unjustly tarnished his reputation.
Dr. Larry Palevsky / Practicing NYS Licensed Pediatrician
A brilliant and well-respected NYS licensed pediatrician with over thirty years’ experience in pediatric healthcare, Dr. Palevsky utilizes a holistic approach to children’s wellness and illness. One of the early pediatricians to sound the alarm on vaccination schedules for children, Dr. Palevsky gave a powerful and fact-filled testimony before the Connecticut Public Health Committee on proposed immunization legislation.
Unfortunately, his testimony and warning about the damaging effects of aluminum nanoparticles in vaccines were disregarded and promptly filed away in the Public Health Committee’s Thank you, but no thank you waste receptacle. Calls for the revocation of Dr. Palevsky’s license soon followed.
Note: If you are pregnant, have a child, or are considering having children, seeattorney Aaron Siri’s amazing Substack post: Injecting Babies:1986 v Today.
In his testimony before the House Judiciary Subcommittee, in the hearing titled, “Follow the Science? Oversight of the Biden COVID-19 Administrative State Response,” Aaron Siri said the following:
Vaccines are the only consumer product where the government defends industry against consumers, instead of vice versa. The same is true for COVID-19 vaccines—the injured are limited to request benefits from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).

Graphic: Aaron Siri / Injecting Freedom
Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell / Critical Care Specialist
A licensed physician trained in emergency medicine and critical care, Dr. Kyle-Sidell was a crucial whistleblower regarding respiratory ventilators. In April 2020, he was part of the Emergency Care Unit at Maimonides Hospital in Brooklyn, New York where he witnessed his patients suffer and die as a result of the medical establishment’s ventilator protocols for treating patients testing positive for COVID-19. Distraught by the disastrous outcomes, Dr. Kyle-Sidell went public and openly questioned the hospital’s unwarranted use of ventilators for patients in need of oxygen (oxygen failure) as opposed to their intended use for patients suffering from a collapsed lung (respiratory failure). This was at a time when Andrew Cuomo, the former New York governor and bureaucrat supreme, was vehemently calling for the purchase of 30,000 ventilators ostensibly for the survival of COVID-19 patients.
The dire warnings asserted by Dr. Kyle-Sidell and doctors experiencing similar challenges were dismissed. Shortly after he left Maimonides, a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) revealed that, in New York’s largest health system, nearly 25 percent of coronavirus patients died from the misuse of ventilators.
Erin Marie Olszewski / Registered Nurse
During the height of the “pandemic,” New York City was said to be ground zero for COVID-19, and Elmhurst Hospital in Queens was identified as the COVID-19 “epicenter.” Erin Marie Olszewski, an Iraqi war veteran, traveled to NYC from Tampa, Florida to volunteer her services. Within her first week at Elmhurst, she discovered something horrific and antithetical to everything she had learned in her training and years of experience: patients not testing positive for COVID-19 were being listed as positive and placed on a ventilator, a sure pathway to their demise. Armed with a strong sense of ethics and a hidden body-worn camera, Nurse Erin risked life, limb, and career to film hospital proceedings and then posted her video from her hotel room in midtown Manhattan. Critics were quick to throw Erin under the bus, but her jaw-dropping film footage exposed the lies being spoon-fed to America and the world.
Karen Kingston / Biotech Analyst Med-Legal Expert
Karen Kingston has worked as a strategic consultant for the medical and pharmaceutical device industry. Some of Ms. Kingston’s clients have included Pfizer, Medtronic, Allergan, Johnson & Johnson, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and a number of smaller companies.
Motivated by strong ethical values and deep religious beliefs, Ms. Kingston broke from corporate ranks when she realized that the major pharmaceutical companies were ramping up production of a toxic, gene-altering vaccine prior to the announcement of the “pandemic” and were planning to include children—the least vulnerable population with the most pristine immune system—in their COVID-19 mass vaccination rollout. After her warnings were unheeded by company officials, she sounded the alarm and contacted thirty-plus media outlets and provided them with crucial information about toxic vaccine ingredients along with inside information related to fabricated clinical trials and the FDA’s complicity in the obfuscation of outcome data. Since then, Ms. Kingston has been physically assaulted, deplatformed, and defamed.
Tammy Clark and Kristen Meghan / Former OSHA PPE Experts
With a combined forty-plus years of experience, government-trained Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) personal protective equipment (PPE) experts Tammy Clark and Kristen Megan were alarmed by the CDC’s mask recommendations and OSHA’s glaring reversal of policies regarding the use and potential hazards of face masks. When they confronted and registered complaints with OSHA officials, they were stonewalled and placed under investigation.
In late 2020, Tammy and Kristen ripped the sheets off of the mask-wearing narrative. These courageous women went viral (no pun intended) with a riveting video warning the public about the ineffectiveness and dangers of wearing a mask as a means of protection against what we were told was a deadly airborne virus. Paradoxically, their informed declarations supported Dr. Fauci’s initial no-mask guidance BEFORE he got the proverbial memo and ran counter to his nonsensical and hypocritical thumbs-up for double-masking AFTER he received the proverbial memo.
Dr. Theresa Long MD / Army Medical Aviation Specialist
A board-certified US Army aerospace medicine specialist with a master’s in public health, Dr. Long served in the military for over thirty years. Remarkably brave and honest, Dr. Long stated the following in her astounding testimony before an expert panel on federal vaccine mandates:
I believe the COVID vaccine is a greater threat to soldiers’ health and military readiness than the virus itself.
Over 200,000 service members have rejected the vaccine, yet the military is pressing forward without regard to the damage to the morale and readiness to process these soldiers out. We have never lost 200,000 soldiers on the battlefield in a few months. Taking soldiers out of uniform has the same impact on readiness as losing them on the battlefield.
Dr. Long’s trepidation was not well received by Army higher-ups. To her astonishment, her fears were ignored and met with arrogance coupled with vindictiveness and award-winning stupidity.
This is how she described her experience:
… I reported to my command my concerns that in one morning I had to ground three out of three pilots due to vaccine injuries. The next day my patients were canceled, my charts were pulled for review, and I was told I would not be seeing acute patients anymore, just healthy pilots there for their flight physical.
Dr. Denis Rancourt / Interdisciplinary Scientist
and Physicist
Renowned in scientific communities the world over for his fact-based statistical research and analysis debunking the pandemic narrative, Dr. Rancourt is a co-founding director of Correlation, a Canada-based not-for-profit organization conducting independent scientific research on topics of public interest.
In a video presentation to the expert scientists at Doctors for COVID Ethics, Dr. Rancourt spoke about his most recent and compelling work, a comprehensive, detailed, and richly illustrated study based on data extrapolated from 125 different countries. The study covers the entire COVID-19 period, before and after the vaccine rollout, and discusses the possible leading causes of excess mortality in different phases.
In a widely referenced 2023 essay (“There Was No Pandemic”) Dr. Rancourt stated:
Here are my conclusions, from our detailed studies of all-cause mortality in the COVID period, in combination with socio-economic and vaccine-rollout data:
1. If there had been no pandemic propaganda or coercion, and governments and the medical establishment had simply gone on with business as usual, then there would not have been any excess mortality
2. There was no pandemic causing excess mortality
3. Measures caused excess mortality
4. COVID-19 vaccination caused excess mortality
Vaccine Safety from the Horse’s Mouth
After decades of aggressively promoting vaccines of all kinds, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, the world’s leading vaccinologist, hasfinally admitted the fact that vaccine safety has never been robustly studied as he has long claimed.
A paper that Dr. Plotkin co-authored was published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on July 6, 2024. It reveals that no vaccine has ever been properly studied either before or after its release.
This is tantamount to learning that the Ford Motor Company knowingly developed and sold tens of thousands of SUVs to the public, and then later admitting that the vehicle’s brakes were never adequately tested—a blatant policy failure resulting in thousands of collisions and deaths.
Lessons Not Learned
Presented with mountains of well-documented peer-reviewed studies and testimonies by leading experts, one would think that the WHO, the CDC, the FDA, pharmaceutical companies, and government regulators would put an immediate end to COVID-19 and other toxic, gene-altering vaccines. Not only are they not ending, they are moving forward full speed ahead.
On August 6, 2024, the WHO’s Dr. Maria Van Kerkhovetold journalists in Geneva, “COVID-19 is still very much with us,” and “the virus is circulating in all countries.”
She also stressed the need for annual vaccine dosage:
As individuals it is important to take measures to reduce risk of infection and severe disease, including ensuring that you have had a COVID-19 vaccination dose in the last twelve months, especially, if you are in an at-risk group.
By sheer coincidence, Dr. Van Kerkhove’s announcement came just two weeks before the FDA announced the approval and authorization of updated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to “better protect against currently circulating variants.” In the interest of full discloser, the FDA’s statement also included a precautionary heads-up for people who either experienced or missed out on the adverse reactions that accompanied previously approved EUA vaccines:
Individuals who receive an updated mRNA COVID-19 vaccine may experience similar side effects as those reported by individuals who previously received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and as described in the respective prescribing information or fact sheets. The updated vaccines are expected to provide protection against COVID-19 caused by the currently circulating variants. Barring the emergence of a markedly more infectious variant of SARS-CoV-2, the FDA anticipates that the composition of COVID-19 vaccines will need to be assessed annually, as occurs for seasonal influenza vaccines.
Calls for Lethal Force
Back at home, calls for increased vaccinations have taken on a new and more terrifying dimension. In a July 2024 interview, Dr. Peter Hotez, director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, called for the United Nations and NATO to deploy security forces against “anti-vaxxers” in the United States.
What I’ve said to the Biden administration is, the health sector can’t solve this on its own. We’re going to have to bring in Homeland Security, the Commerce Department, Justice Department to help us understand how to do this.
I’ve said the same with… I met with [WHO general director] Dr. Tedros last month … to say, I don’t know that the World Health Organization can solve this on our own. We need the other United Nations agencies—NATO. This is a security problem because it’s no longer a “construct” or some arcane academic exercise. Two-hundred-thousand Americans died because of anti-vaccine aggression, anti-science aggression.
And so, this is now a lethal force … and now I feel as a pediatric vaccine scientist … it’s important, just as important for me to make new vaccines, to save lives. The other side of saving lives is countering this anti-vaccine aggression.
Dr. Hotez’s controversial views have not gone unrewarded by the generous global elites doling out the cookies. Among his list of numerous accolades, Dr. Hotez, along with his colleague Dr. Maria Elena Bottazzi, was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2022 for developing Corbevax, an open-patent COVID-19 vaccine that was administered to more than 70 million children in India as of 2023. Before announcing Hotez’s nomination, I wonder if the Nobel committee was aware of the tens of thousands of injuries and related deaths caused by Corbevax and other vaccines foisted (without consent) on the unsuspecting poorer populations of India and Africa causing a combined 450,000 injuries and deaths. Fortunately for Dr. Hotez, all is not lost. Scientists worthy of a Nobel nomination rarely go away empty-handed. In 2024, Time magazine named Hotez a “Science Warrior” and one of the one hundred most influential people in global health.
There’s Gold in Them Thar Hills!

Credit: Adam Glanzman/Bloomberg/Getty Images/File
Fear, compliance, and willful ignorance—gifts that keep on giving.
Seasonal coronavirus shots are well on their way to becoming part of America’s standard diet of delusional healthcare practices. Every year, a new variant, a new booster—the perfect business model.
Moderna, one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies with a current net worth of $57.94 billion, has wasted little time to cash in and take the lead with the rollout of mFLUSIVA vaccine (another convoluted hard to pronounce name) targeting seniors.
CNN reported that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the first mRNA flu vaccine for use in older adults:
This first-of-its-kind mRNA flu vaccine has faced a bumpy road to approval amid a political climate not friendly to the technology: The Trump administration has cut funding for mRNA vaccine development, and the FDA initially declined Moderna’s request to review the vaccine. But the agency’s independent vaccine advisers unanimously voted in June that the new vaccine’s benefits outweigh its risks.
The “agency’s independent vaccine advisers?” I wonder who those folks might be?
In an August 5, 2026 press release, Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel announced:
Flu remains a significant public health challenge, and mFLUSIVA provides an important new option for America’s seniors. This approval also reflects the ongoing potential of our mRNA platform to help address important public health challenges through continued scientific innovation.
The same press release listed a number of side effects associated with mFLUSIVA:
Injection site reactions: pain, tenderness and swelling of the lymph nodes in the same arm as the injection, swelling (hardness), and redness.
General side effects: fatigue, headache, muscle pain, joint pain, chills, nausea or vomiting, and fever.
Addressing additional “side effects,” Moderna provided an mFLUSIVA fact sheet that states:
These may not be all of the possible side effects of mFLUSIVA. Ask your healthcare provider about any side effects that concern you. You may report side effects to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) at 1-800-822-7967 or https://vaers.hhs.gov.
You mean, there might be more?
SHIT! SIGN ME UP—YESTERDAY!
Bioweapon Defense Contracts
In the face of a US budget deficit nearing $40 trillion, and a US Department of War budget totaling $961.6 billion in FY2026, the Pentagon is investing billions in mRNA platforms for “rapid response to emerging threats.”
This is at a time when 47.9 million Americans residing in the “greatest country in the world” live in food-insecure households, 13.7 percent of all US households.
The Pentagon’s budget documents explicitly reference the need for prototype vaccines utilizing mature platforms, including mRNA, to counter biological threats. Exactly who is initiating and controlling the threats is rarely discussed and are more often than not identified as “unnamed sources.” Journalists attempting to challenge the official narrative are shadow banned and censored and may find themselves looking for work at Starbucks or Trader Joe’s.
Future Prospects
I’ve long been considered an optimist. But given our present track record as a species, I fear that our future political, economic, and social prospects are dismal to say the least.
Collectively, we are stuck in a self-indulgent, narcissistic trance blinded by smartphones, social media, and artificial intelligence—a soulless innovation that offers biased results at lightning speeds, supplanting genuine imagination, creativity, and originality along with the very real and ominous potential to supersede objective reality for current and future generations.
We have morphed into a compliant army of substance-addicted walking barcodes devoid of humanity, content to be heads-down participants in a technocratic totalitarian state on a collision course destined for never-ending wars and self-destruction.
I truly wish I had an answer, but at present my empty pockets are turned inside out. When I rack my brain for a morsel of hope and encouragement, only one word comes to mind.
Resist! Resist! Resist!
Additional Resources:
- “Cov-19 Immunity in 19 Minutes”
- “Vaxxed 3 | Authorized To Kill”
- “Plandemic 3: The Great Awakening (Full, Unedited Movie)”
- “The End of Germ Theory”
- “Shots: Eugenics To Pandemics” (2022 Documentary)”
- “A Farewell To Virology (Part 1): Dr Mark Bailey / Steve Falconer”
- “A Farewell To Virology – Part 2/3 | Spacebusters”
- “A Farewell To Virology – Part 3/3 | Spacebusters”
- “Do Viruses Exist?”
- Truth Virus.Net
- The Future – How They Will Control All of Us. Is “The Deep State” Preparing for Another “Plandemic”
